Living Alone vs Flatsharing in Europe: Poland Case Study

The Stark Numbers Behind the Crisis

Europe's housing crisis isn't uniform—it manifests differently across regions, but the common thread is the growing disconnect between housing costs and average incomes. Southern and Western European cities face the most severe pressures, with Barcelona reporting the most unaffordable housing market and cities like Amsterdam and Zurich firmly in the unaffordable category.

Meanwhile, Central and Eastern European cities, including many in Poland, maintain more moderate costs but face rapidly increasing prices that threaten to outpace income growth. The financial burden of housing has become so severe that the European Commission has, for the first time, appointed a Commissioner specifically tasked with addressing the continent's housing crisis.

The Commission recognizes that this is no longer just a social issue but an economic one that risks damaging our competitiveness by restricting labor mobility and even affecting demography as young people delay starting families due to housing insecurity

.

The Core Financial Divide: Solo Living Versus Sharing

At its most fundamental level, the choice between living alone and flatsharing represents a simple financial calculation: how much are you willing to pay for privacy? The answer varies dramatically by location, but the pattern holds true across the continent—living alone commands a substantial premium.

Table: Monthly Rental Costs Comparison in Selected European Cities (2025)

Utilities and Recurring Costs

The economies of scale in shared living extend significantly to utility costs, which have become particularly volatile amid Europe's energy uncertainties. According to Numbeo data, basic utilities (electricity, heating, cooling, water, garbage) for an 85m² apartment in Poland average 1,105 zł (approximately €240) monthly. In a flatshare, this cost is divided among residents, creating immediate savings.

Germany presents an even starker utility contrast, with electricity prices reaching €0.39 per kWh—the highest in Europe—compared to Hungary's €0.11. These differentials mean that German flatsharers not only split costs but benefit from reduced per-capita energy consumption compared to solo dwellers.

The Upfront Financial Hurdles

The initial costs of securing housing also favor flatsharing:

• Security deposits: Often equivalent to 1-3 months' rent, creating a significantly lower cash outlay for a single room versus an entire apartment
• Agency fees: Typically proportional to the rental price, thus lower for room rentals
• Furniture and setup costs: Entirely borne by solo dwellers versus shared among flatmates

Location Trade-Offs

Flatsharing frequently enables residence in more central, desirable neighborhoods that might be financially out of reach for solo dwellers. This translates to reduced transportation costs and time—a significant hidden saving for urban professionals.

The Case for Living Alone: Privacy and Autonomy

The most obvious benefit of living alone—complete privacy—carries profound implications for quality of life. The ability to control one's environment, schedule, and social interactions without compromise represents a form of luxury that many urban professionals are increasingly willing to pay for.

Uncompromised autonomy: Control over noise levels, cleaning standards, guest policies, and decor

Mental space: Freedom from interpersonal tensions or incompatible lifestyles that can emerge in shared living situations

Productivity: Undistracted work environment, particularly valuable in the era of remote work

For those establishing careers in creative or knowledge industries, the uninterrupted focus afforded by solo living can potentially translate to professional advancement that offsets the financial premium.

The Flatsharing Advantage: Built-in Community and Support

• While flatsharing demands compromises, it offers intangible benefits particularly valuable for those new to a city or country:
• As one young professional in Rotterdam—where studio rents saw a dramatic 26% increase in 2025—noted: My flatmates have become my emergency contacts, my celebration partners, and my cultural interpreters as I navigate Dutch culture.

Warsaw: Poland's Evolving Market

Warsaw presents a fascinating case study of a city balancing between its affordable Eastern European roots and rapid economic convergence with Western standards. With a cost of living index of 45.12, significantly below Western European capitals, Warsaw still offers relative value—but the gap is closing quickly.

The city has experienced some of Europe's most dramatic housing price increases, with Poland recording a 15% year-on-year jump in early 2024—the highest in the EU. This surge reflects both economic growth and population pressures, including the influx of Ukrainian refugees that caused rents to spike 14% in just weeks during 2022.

For Varsovians, the choice between a city center apartment at 2,838.81 zł (≈€620) monthly versus one outside the center at 2,338.08 zł (≈€510) represents a significant financial decision. Flatsharing becomes an strategic choice to access desirable neighborhoods while maintaining disposable income in a city where the average net salary is 6,050.94 zł (≈€1,320).

Berlin: The Former Flatsharing Capital

Berlin's legendary flatsharing culture has faced mounting pressures as rental prices have climbed despite the introduction of rent caps. The city now finds itself in the moderate affordability category but risks slipping into unaffordability as housing costs continue to outpace incomes.

The German capital demonstrates how cultural norms around housing evolve with economic pressures. Where flatsharing was once a lifestyle choice for Berliners of all ages, it has increasingly become a financial necessity for younger residents. With electricity prices among Europe's highest, the utility savings from sharing become particularly meaningful.

Amsterdam: The Unaffordable Ideal

Amsterdam represents the extreme end of the housing spectrum, with room rents surpassing €1,000 per month and apartment rents averaging €2,500. The city's mayor places it firmly in the unaffordable category, creating a situation where flatsharing has become the default for anyone without a substantial income.

The Dutch capital's situation illustrates how housing unaffordability can potentially impact urban diversity and workforce availability, as service workers, junior professionals, and even mid-career specialists struggle to find financially viable living arrangements.

When Living Alone Makes Sense

• Based on extensive financial data and qualitative research, a framework emerges for making this deeply personal decision.
• Financial profile: When your rent would constitute ≤35% of your net income
• Career stage: When your work requires extensive remote work or mental focus that demands privacy
• Personality: When you highly value control over your environment and have established social connections outside home
• Timeline: When planning to stay in a city long enough to justify the setup costs

When Flatsharing Is the Smarter Choice

• Financial priorities: When maximizing savings rate, debt repayment, or investment contributions
• Transition periods: During the first year in a new city or country
• Social needs: When building new connections or combating loneliness
• Budget constraints: When solo housing would consume >40% of net income
• Table: Annual Financial Impact Comparison (Warsaw Example)